she walked away

17968442_10208450216565239_2139642115_o.jpg

she left

without a word;

she walked away

into the sun,

leaving me behind.

 

i don’t know

when she’ll come back,

if she will…

ever.

 

we were together

every step of the way,

until she went on

without me.

 

time passes by,

as i watch

each wave,

tumble

on the shore.

 

i can’t go on

without her —

i am stuck.

move on?

how can i?

 

i sit here

on the sand,

waiting

for her footsteps.

 

longing,

to become one

with her;

for our soles

to be in union…

again.

-the sandal whisperer

Advertisements

Ancient Stone Tablets Unearthed

Archeologists recently unearthed two tablets of stone believed to be written by Divine fingers.  They were discovered in caves near the Old Sea.

According to the inscriptions found at the top, which appear to be the Preface to the whole document, what it contains are eternal moral commandments: “These 9 Commandments — not 10 — are the Eternal, Moral Law.  They are binding on all mankind, past, present, future; Jews or Gentiles; saved or unsaved.”

AC Entolay, a leading expert on The Law, underscored how important this new discovery is, and what implications it carries:

“This is of utmost importance,” he said, “because these freshly discovered tablets of stone establishes what we have only been theorizing for centuries, ie, that The Decalogue is still binding… all 9 of them.”

There are those who believe that the Ten Commandments given by Yahweh to Moses on Mt.Sinai are binding on all men.  These are the Covenant Men.

On the other hand, there are those who believe that the Ten Commandments have been abolished and is now obsolete — Christ putting an end to it.  These are the New Covenant Men.

The discovery of these two tablets of stone containing only 9 Commandments is now shaking the foundations of both the Covenant Men and the New Covenant Men.

A spokesman of the New Covenant Men, GG Dumps, commented, “We were all caught with our pants down!  We have to give this a new name.”

RS Giffer, who has seen the new discovery, made this observation, “Upon close inspection, it appears that the tablets of stone have been glued together.  They may well be the original document that Moses broke, which was written by the finger of God, but has carefully been put together without the missing pieces.”

According to RS Giffer, the Preface appears to be a recent addition: “The first tablet was obviously missing major chunks.  No.4 was nowhere to be found, ie, the inscriptions only had 1, 2, 3, & 5.  The Preface was obviously written over the original, probably when the tablets underwent repair.”  It takes exceptional skill to put a spin on a very old artifact and make it universally applicable.

But, it might take time before the air clears and the dust settles on this latest pieced-together artifact.  One question, however, looms regarding the broken pieces: Will they find the rest?

What About the Sabbath? (2 of 2)

The Christians’ gathering on the first day of the week was entirely different from the Jewish Sabbath which was still widely observed by the Jews at the time.

First and foremost, it was a voluntary act.  There was no prescription at all to begin with.  The first reference to a coming together of Christians is in Acts 2.  Here we are told that they “continued daily with one accord in the Temple,” v.46.  They were there not because they heeded a command.  We are simply told that the disciples continued steadfastly in “the Apostles’ doctrine, fellowship, breaking of bread, and prayers,” v.42.

The first reference to a coming together of the disciples on the first day of the week is in Acts 20.7.  Acts 20.7 records the gathering of the disciples at Troas on the first day of the week “to break bread.”  The way the “coming together of the disciples to break bread” was described indicates it was a normal occurrence.  Here Apostle Paul preaches.

The other reference to a first day of the week gathering is in 1 Cor.16.1.  Here, Apostle Paul gives instruction to the church, “concerning the collection for the saints,” for them to do it on the first day of the week.  It is noteworthy that the practice of coming together on the first day of the week was already widespread at this time.  This is clear as Paul’s instruction to the Corinthians was merely a reiteration of his instruction to the churches in Galatia, “As I have given instruction to the churches in Galatia, so do ye also.”  It is not unreasonable to imply that this was the prevailing practice among the churches then.

Thus, aside from the breaking of bread, a collection was gathered as the disciples came together on the first day of the week.  There was also (at least on one occasion in Troas) preaching/teaching.

 

Three instances make the first day of the week stand out.  First, the risen Jesus met with his disciples twice on the first day of the week — first, on the day of the resurrection itself; then the following week.  What was intended to be the retreat of fearful, cowardly disciples turned out to be the first coming together of disciples for Christian worship.  It became a time of meditation, reassurance, and empowerment for these first witnesses.

Secondly, the day of Pentecost in Acts 2, although special to the Jews, was made uber-special to Christians because it was the day the Holy Spirit was first poured out (Acts 2.17) and appeared in “a mighty rushing wind and flaming tongues as of fire” (Acts 2.3-5.)   It was also the first day of the week.

And thirdly, John describes a certain “Lord’s day” in Revelations.  There he says, “I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s day,” and from then on began seeing visions, that eventually became The Revelations.  This phrase, the Lord’s day, is generally recognized as referring to the first day of the week, the day when the Lord Jesus rose from the dead and appeared to them.

This is, by and large, the reason I believe Christians gather together and meet for worship on the first day of the week, ie, Sunday.  Not because it is the Sabbath day, but because it is the Lord’s day.  The belief that the Lord’s day and the Sabbath command have no vital connection, aligns me with NCT thought.

But this does not lay down a prescription, ie, for Sunday worship.  What began by the liberty of the (S)spirit, cannot degenerate into a law of the flesh.  Sunday worship, although desirable and most natural, is not absolute.

This was exemplified in Acts 2.46a.  Here we are told that the first Jewish converts (disciples) “continued daily with one accord in the Temple.”  They met daily.  And they met according to the liberty of the (S)spirit, not according to the bondage of the flesh.  There are other recorded gatherings of disciples in the Book of Acts but we are not told that these were invariably on the first day of the week.  There are no other records that the disciples came together to break bread except in Acts 20.7.  There are also no other texts that indicate the disciples came together for the collections on the first day of the week except in 1 Cor.16.1, 2, referring to both the church in Corinth and the churches in Galatia.

Sunday worship is desirable and natural, being commemorative of the day Jesus rose from the dead and appeared to his disciples.  But Friday is equally an acceptable day of worship, as no specific day was prescribed or commanded in Scriptures to be the day of worship for the NT church.

“God is Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth,” John 4.24.

What About the Sabbath? (1 of 2)

(NOTE: I did not study NCT because I wanted to be an adherent; I searched the Scriptures and discovered that my view had major similarities with what NCT teaches.)

NCT adherents do not keep a Sabbath day, ie, remembering the Sabbath day to keep it holy is not in their list of what God desires of them as Christians.

The argument re: the Sabbath becomes passe if you consider that the Ten Commandments was intended only for the Jews.  Subsequent reiterations of and indictments about not keeping Sabbaths in the Prophets are clearly against the Jews only.

A singular example in the time of Nehemiah (Ch.13) makes this evident.  At the time, merchants from Tyre came to the city (Jerusalem) and sold “fish and all manner of ware on the Sabbath” (v.16) to the children of Judah.  Nehemiah rebuked them.  He rebuked both “the nobles of Judah” (v.17) and “the merchants and sellers” (vv.20, 21.)  His rebuke showed a clear understanding of the nature of the Sabbath command.

First he said to the nobles of Judah, “Why do you profane the Sabbath day? Did not your fathers thus, and did not our God bring all this evil upon us, and upon this city? yet ye bring more wrath upon Israel by profaning the Sabbath!” (vv.17, 18.)

Then, later, he said to the merchants and sellers, waiting for the city gates to open so they can sell on the Sabbath “Why lodge ye about the wall, if ye do so again, I will lay hands on you!” (v.21.)  These merchants and sellers were obviously not under the Sabbath as the Jews were.

There is a far more important reason why I don’t believe in keeping Sabbaths.  Sabbath keeping was never taught in the NT.  Nowhere in the NT — in Acts and especially in the epistles to the churches — is there any reference to, examples of, or instructions on Sabbath keeping for the church to follow.  None at all.  Thus, neither is there any warning or rebuke towards Christians breaking or profaning the Sabbath.

There is, however, sufficient evidence to support the notion that the church, as a practice, gathered and met on the first day of the week.  It appears to have been made the initial pattern set by the apostles.  However, to say that this gathering of Christians on the first day of the week was according to the 4th commandment is a far stretch of the imagination the Apostles obviously never actually taught.  The Christians’ gathering on the first day of the week was entirely different from the Jewish Sabbath which was still widely observed by the Jews at the time.

Why New Covenant Theology?

A glimpse of New Covenant Theology (NCT): Why I identify myself with NCT?

When I was still a Reformed Baptist, I saw this “new” teaching, NCT, as antinomian (anti-Law.)  Now that I identify myself with NCT, I know why Reformed Baptists see this teaching as antinomian (tongue-in-cheek.)

It is antinomian not against the idea of Law in general, but as pertaining a very specific Law, namely, the Ten Commandments.  NCT holds to the belief that the Ten Commandments were given by God specifically (only) to the Jews — it was God’s covenant with the Jews.  The Ten Commandments was given, not to all mankind in a general way, nor to Christians in a spiritual way; but to the Jews in a special covenantal way.  It was given to the Jews after God delivered them from Pharaoh in Egypt, before God brought them to the Promised Land.

Exodus 34 records the LORD giving instructions to Moses re: the covenant.  In vv.27 & 28, the passage reads, “And the LORD said unto Moses, ‘Write thou these words: for after the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with thee and with Israel.‘  And he was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread nor drink water.  And he wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the Ten Commandments.  It is clear then that the Ten Commandments are the covenant of the LORD with Israel — the Old Covenant.

(By the way, the tables written by the finger of God… that was broken by Moses.  The 2nd Edition, as described in Exo.34… that was written by Moses.)

The writer to the Hebrews describes this Old Covenant in these terms: “In that he saith, a new covenant, he hath made the first old.  Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away,” Heb.8.13.  He goes on in Chapter 9 to describe the major divisions of and essential items in the Jewish Temple (Tabernacle) in detail.  One of the items in the Temple, located inside the Ark of the Covenant within the Holy of Holies, are the two tables of stone where the words of the Old Covenant, the Ten Commandments were written.

The writer argues that all these things being part of the Old Covenant were mere types and shadows, and have now been done away with because the reality (the anti-type) in the person of Jesus Christ has now appeared and is now here.

Someone might ask, But if you do away with the Ten Commandments, what is your Rule of Life?  Answer: The Law of Christ or The Law of Love.  Jesus said it in this manner: “Love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, soul, and strength; And love your neighbour as yourself: On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.”  But isn’t Jesus referring there to the two tables of the Ten Commandments?  No, apparently not.

Apostle John, addressing believers in particular, hones in on the unique source from where obedience to these two commandments emanates.  He says, “This is his commandment: To believe on the name of his son, Jesus Christ; and to love one another, as he has given us command.”  No one can in fact love God, much less love him with all his being, that is, unless he first believes on the name of Jesus Christ.  All love emanates from this first grace of faith — whether it is love to God, love to fellow believers, love to neighbour, or the extreme challenge, love to enemies; it all flows from this first grace, viz, faith in Jesus Christ.  It likewise sustains its impetus by subsequent grace, viz, faith.  Thus, the law of Love, the law of Christ is all of faith, from first to last — all of grace.  Alongside and against this, “there is no law.”

So Apostle Paul could say, “I have been crucified with Christ, nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh, I live by the faith of the Son of God who loved me, and gave himself for me,” Gal.2.20.