What About the Sabbath? (2 of 2)

The Christians’ gathering on the first day of the week was entirely different from the Jewish Sabbath which was still widely observed by the Jews at the time.

First and foremost, it was a voluntary act.  There was no prescription at all to begin with.  The first reference to a coming together of Christians is in Acts 2.  Here we are told that they “continued daily with one accord in the Temple,” v.46.  They were there not because they heeded a command.  We are simply told that the disciples continued steadfastly in “the Apostles’ doctrine, fellowship, breaking of bread, and prayers,” v.42.

The first reference to a coming together of the disciples on the first day of the week is in Acts 20.7.  Acts 20.7 records the gathering of the disciples at Troas on the first day of the week “to break bread.”  The way the “coming together of the disciples to break bread” was described indicates it was a normal occurrence.  Here Apostle Paul preaches.

The other reference to a first day of the week gathering is in 1 Cor.16.1.  Here, Apostle Paul gives instruction to the church, “concerning the collection for the saints,” for them to do it on the first day of the week.  It is noteworthy that the practice of coming together on the first day of the week was already widespread at this time.  This is clear as Paul’s instruction to the Corinthians was merely a reiteration of his instruction to the churches in Galatia, “As I have given instruction to the churches in Galatia, so do ye also.”  It is not unreasonable to imply that this was the prevailing practice among the churches then.

Thus, aside from the breaking of bread, a collection was gathered as the disciples came together on the first day of the week.  There was also (at least on one occasion in Troas) preaching/teaching.


Three instances make the first day of the week stand out.  First, the risen Jesus met with his disciples twice on the first day of the week — first, on the day of the resurrection itself; then the following week.  What was intended to be the retreat of fearful, cowardly disciples turned out to be the first coming together of disciples for Christian worship.  It became a time of meditation, reassurance, and empowerment for these first witnesses.

Secondly, the day of Pentecost in Acts 2, although special to the Jews, was made uber-special to Christians because it was the day the Holy Spirit was first poured out (Acts 2.17) and appeared in “a mighty rushing wind and flaming tongues as of fire” (Acts 2.3-5.)   It was also the first day of the week.

And thirdly, John describes a certain “Lord’s day” in Revelations.  There he says, “I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s day,” and from then on began seeing visions, that eventually became The Revelations.  This phrase, the Lord’s day, is generally recognized as referring to the first day of the week, the day when the Lord Jesus rose from the dead and appeared to them.

This is, by and large, the reason I believe Christians gather together and meet for worship on the first day of the week, ie, Sunday.  Not because it is the Sabbath day, but because it is the Lord’s day.  The belief that the Lord’s day and the Sabbath command have no vital connection, aligns me with NCT thought.

But this does not lay down a prescription, ie, for Sunday worship.  What began by the liberty of the (S)spirit, cannot degenerate into a law of the flesh.  Sunday worship, although desirable and most natural, is not absolute.

This was exemplified in Acts 2.46a.  Here we are told that the first Jewish converts (disciples) “continued daily with one accord in the Temple.”  They met daily.  And they met according to the liberty of the (S)spirit, not according to the bondage of the flesh.  There are other recorded gatherings of disciples in the Book of Acts but we are not told that these were invariably on the first day of the week.  There are no other records that the disciples came together to break bread except in Acts 20.7.  There are also no other texts that indicate the disciples came together for the collections on the first day of the week except in 1 Cor.16.1, 2, referring to both the church in Corinth and the churches in Galatia.

Sunday worship is desirable and natural, being commemorative of the day Jesus rose from the dead and appeared to his disciples.  But Friday is equally an acceptable day of worship, as no specific day was prescribed or commanded in Scriptures to be the day of worship for the NT church.

“God is Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth,” John 4.24.

What About the Sabbath? (1 of 2)

(NOTE: I did not study NCT because I wanted to be an adherent; I searched the Scriptures and discovered that my view had major similarities with what NCT teaches.)

NCT adherents do not keep a Sabbath day, ie, remembering the Sabbath day to keep it holy is not in their list of what God desires of them as Christians.

The argument re: the Sabbath becomes passe if you consider that the Ten Commandments was intended only for the Jews.  Subsequent reiterations of and indictments about not keeping Sabbaths in the Prophets are clearly against the Jews only.

A singular example in the time of Nehemiah (Ch.13) makes this evident.  At the time, merchants from Tyre came to the city (Jerusalem) and sold “fish and all manner of ware on the Sabbath” (v.16) to the children of Judah.  Nehemiah rebuked them.  He rebuked both “the nobles of Judah” (v.17) and “the merchants and sellers” (vv.20, 21.)  His rebuke showed a clear understanding of the nature of the Sabbath command.

First he said to the nobles of Judah, “Why do you profane the Sabbath day? Did not your fathers thus, and did not our God bring all this evil upon us, and upon this city? yet ye bring more wrath upon Israel by profaning the Sabbath!” (vv.17, 18.)

Then, later, he said to the merchants and sellers, waiting for the city gates to open so they can sell on the Sabbath “Why lodge ye about the wall, if ye do so again, I will lay hands on you!” (v.21.)  These merchants and sellers were obviously not under the Sabbath as the Jews were.

There is a far more important reason why I don’t believe in keeping Sabbaths.  Sabbath keeping was never taught in the NT.  Nowhere in the NT — in Acts and especially in the epistles to the churches — is there any reference to, examples of, or instructions on Sabbath keeping for the church to follow.  None at all.  Thus, neither is there any warning or rebuke towards Christians breaking or profaning the Sabbath.

There is, however, sufficient evidence to support the notion that the church, as a practice, gathered and met on the first day of the week.  It appears to have been made the initial pattern set by the apostles.  However, to say that this gathering of Christians on the first day of the week was according to the 4th commandment is a far stretch of the imagination the Apostles obviously never actually taught.  The Christians’ gathering on the first day of the week was entirely different from the Jewish Sabbath which was still widely observed by the Jews at the time.

Why New Covenant Theology?

A glimpse of New Covenant Theology (NCT): Why I identify myself with NCT?

When I was still a Reformed Baptist, I saw this “new” teaching, NCT, as antinomian (anti-Law.)  Now that I identify myself with NCT, I know why Reformed Baptists see this teaching as antinomian (tongue-in-cheek.)

It is antinomian not against the idea of Law in general, but as pertaining a very specific Law, namely, the Ten Commandments.  NCT holds to the belief that the Ten Commandments were given by God specifically (only) to the Jews — it was God’s covenant with the Jews.  The Ten Commandments was given, not to all mankind in a general way, nor to Christians in a spiritual way; but to the Jews in a special covenantal way.  It was given to the Jews after God delivered them from Pharaoh in Egypt, before God brought them to the Promised Land.

Exodus 34 records the LORD giving instructions to Moses re: the covenant.  In vv.27 & 28, the passage reads, “And the LORD said unto Moses, ‘Write thou these words: for after the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with thee and with Israel.‘  And he was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread nor drink water.  And he wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the Ten Commandments.  It is clear then that the Ten Commandments are the covenant of the LORD with Israel — the Old Covenant.

(By the way, the tables written by the finger of God… that was broken by Moses.  The 2nd Edition, as described in Exo.34… that was written by Moses.)

The writer to the Hebrews describes this Old Covenant in these terms: “In that he saith, a new covenant, he hath made the first old.  Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away,” Heb.8.13.  He goes on in Chapter 9 to describe the major divisions of and essential items in the Jewish Temple (Tabernacle) in detail.  One of the items in the Temple, located inside the Ark of the Covenant within the Holy of Holies, are the two tables of stone where the words of the Old Covenant, the Ten Commandments were written.

The writer argues that all these things being part of the Old Covenant were mere types and shadows, and have now been done away with because the reality (the anti-type) in the person of Jesus Christ has now appeared and is now here.

Someone might ask, But if you do away with the Ten Commandments, what is your Rule of Life?  Answer: The Law of Christ or The Law of Love.  Jesus said it in this manner: “Love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, soul, and strength; And love your neighbour as yourself: On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.”  But isn’t Jesus referring there to the two tables of the Ten Commandments?  No, apparently not.

Apostle John, addressing believers in particular, hones in on the unique source from where obedience to these two commandments emanates.  He says, “This is his commandment: To believe on the name of his son, Jesus Christ; and to love one another, as he has given us command.”  No one can in fact love God, much less love him with all his being, that is, unless he first believes on the name of Jesus Christ.  All love emanates from this first grace of faith — whether it is love to God, love to fellow believers, love to neighbour, or the extreme challenge, love to enemies; it all flows from this first grace, viz, faith in Jesus Christ.  It likewise sustains its impetus by subsequent grace, viz, faith.  Thus, the law of Love, the law of Christ is all of faith, from first to last — all of grace.  Alongside and against this, “there is no law.”

So Apostle Paul could say, “I have been crucified with Christ, nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh, I live by the faith of the Son of God who loved me, and gave himself for me,” Gal.2.20.

50 something

as my day ends — “my day” because it’s my birthday — i take stock of my life, an aspect of it…

i am half-broke.  broke a lot of times and unable to do things that require money to do or accomplish.  can’t afford to buy a lot of things.  can’t travel far.  can’t enjoy many pleasures.  but don’t pity me: i don’t believe that life consists in the abundance of materials things.

i am not poor by any means.  yeah, poor compared to my rich friends who have a lot of money (millions and millions) and property.  but not poor, compared to the homeless street urchin or the couples with little kids who live in pushcarts, residing anywhere they find safe shelter at, and feed off whatever convenient edible items they find rummaging in garbage dumps or on whatever kindness they receive from strangers.

i have not been too attracted to wealth.  i never chased after wealth, and wealth never chased after me.  i have a carefree attitude towards money.  why?  i am not sure.  it may be genetic (born this way,) accidental (ended up this way,) environmental (grew up this way,) or religious (faith led me this way.)

i was born this way.  no one can challenge that.  i was born with the carefree gene.  too carefree to care about anything (be it failure or success) at all — and money.  it’s an empty void as dense as a black hole.  doesn’t make life easy at all!

i may have become a carefree person as a result of a head injury i sustained when i was a year old.  i remember everything around me visually spinning when i hit my forehead on the sharp corner of the glass-covered center table in our living room.  something blacked out inside my frontal lobe.  i was rushed, bleeding, to the ER — received so many stitches above my cracked right eyebrow.  there is a hitman — a cold assassin — inside of me.

but growing up may have also taught me that happiness is not only achieved by having a lot of money, and whatever a lot of money can buy.  yes, i learned that it could give you that happiness.  but i also learned that it is not only money and the things money can buy that can give you happiness.

i learned that friends, the company of friends — the ones who aren’t bought with money, that is — are a genuine source of happiness for me.  much more happiness than the things money can buy can give.  in this regard i consider my friends much more valuable than money — losing friends is a greater loss to me than losing money.  how much money can you price-tag a friend?  and, of course, family — their love, and the happiness they give — that can never be replaced!

my faith in God has also taught me to trust in him despite appearances of hard times.  it’s a divine catch-22: God tells me, “since you are content with little wealth, why should i give you more?  i’d give you more faith instead, and just enough money.”  and, in the divine economy in heaven, i learned that faith is more valuable than earthly wealth.  but when there are people who depend on you for the things money can buy — the necessities of life — and when you owe people money… “God, give me more money, please!  yes po, of course, i will work for it.”

as far as health is concerned, it always declines, never improves.  when you hear your doctor say, “your health is improving!” or “you look better!” either you’re recovering from a stroke or a triple bypass operation, or he’s just commenting on the visible rejuvenating effects of stem-cell therapy or viagra on your general outlook in life.  50 somethings’ health is never improving, always declining.

i am 50 something.

dalawang kasal

ikinasal ang pamangkin kong babae, si hannah, noong nakaraang sabado, feb.18.  isang simpleng kasalan sa bulwagan ng Moonwalk Community Bible Church (MCBC) at isang simpleng reception sa parehong bulwagan — simple dahil ang mga pagkain ay pinag-ambag-ambagan lang ng mga panauhin (kamag-anak at kaibigan.)  simpleng reception subalit napakasarap at babalik-balikan!

ikinasal ang pamangkin ko sa tatay ng 2-taong gulang na anak nya — si jason.  di man maayos ang simulain para sa dalawang ikinasal, ay mabuti at naiayos, at nailagay sa tuwid at marangal ang kanilang kalagayan.


nagbalik-ala-ala tuloy ang isang kasal na, sa lahat ng kasalan na napuntahan ko… kakaiba!  ito (sa akin) ang ‘wedding of the century!’  ito (ayon sa sabi-sabi) ang mag-uuwi ng… pancit!

ang kasalan ay naganap sa isang malayong lugar, sa rizal, nueva ecija.  malayo para sa mga tiga-maynila: malayo dahil kung hindi makakatawid ng ilog ang sasakyan mo, tatawid ito sa isang makitid na tulay na walang harang sa gilid.  subalit hindi ang layo nito ang dahilan kung bakit (sa akin) itong kasalang ito ay naging kakaiba.

isa lang marahil syang karaniwang kasalang purbinsya, kung hindi dahil dun sa kalesang hinihila ng kabayo, o tiburin, kung saan nakasakay ang ‘bride’ (ang babaeng ikakasal — tawagin na lang natin sya sa pangalang… malou.)

tapos na ang processional, lahat ng mga kalahok sa kasal — ang groom, mga ninong at ninang, mga abay, mga magulang ng ikakasal, atbp. — ay nasa kani-kanilang puwesto na sa kasal.  ang bride na lang ang hinihintay.  at ang pinaka-aabangang bride (alam ng lahat) ay ihahatid sa paanan ng simbahan sakay ng tiburin.  lahat ng mga mata (ngayon) ay nakatuon na sa puwang ng pintuan ng simbahan kung saan magaganap ang paghatid at pagbaba ng bride mula sa tiburin, at ang kasunod nitong ‘bridal march.’

dumating na ang pinakahihintay na sandali: unti-unti nang natanaw ng lahat — una, ang nguso, mukha, at leeg ng kabayo.  ang kalahati ng kanyang katawan at ang unang bahagi ng tiburin na may palamuti.  ayun na ang tiburin, sakay ang bride.  ayun na… ayun na… ayayay… lumagpas!  dere-deretso ang kabayo at hindi huminto sa tapat ng simbahan.  ay, dedere-deretso sa ilog sakay ang bride!


walang utak!

kumain kami ni jane, sa buddy’s, sa kanlurang gilid ng shopwise cubao.  mura pala dun, sa halagang P300+ busog na kaming dalawa.  sa loob, mapalamuti ang paligid, pakiramdam mong para kang nasa kapistahan (fiesta.)

pre-valentine’s lunch ito kasi feb.12.  di na kami lumabas para kumain nung balentime’s.  binigyan ko na lang si jane ng bulaklak — ecuadorian roses na lavander… naks!


first time ko itong kakain sa buddy’s, kaya tinanong ko si waiter-boy kung ano specialty nila.

“pancit lukban, sir,” sagot nya, “longganisang lukban.”

“o sige, yun ang oorderin ko.”

“tikman natin,” sabi ko kay jane.


nasa hapag: pancit lukban at longganisang lukban (longsilog)

first time ko sa buddy’s pero di ko naman first time makakakain ng longganisang lukban o pancit lukban (alam kong suka ang nilalagay sa pancit at hindi toyo o patis.)  marami ngang sahog yung pancit, may toppings pa na lechong kawali.

ang hatol: yung longganisa (longsilog sya) – masarap na rin, masarap almusal na tanghalian.  yung pancit, pwede na, pero di ko babalik-balikan (eh mahilig ako sa pancit.)

kumain muli kami ni jane sa buddy’s after 2 weeks… kanina.  nasa araneta center kasi kami at naisipan naman naming subukan ang bulalo nila.

nag order din ako ng ‘buddy’s burger’ at macaroni salad — para rin masubukan.  di man nila ito specialty, dapat masarap pa rin para babalik-balikan.

ang hatol: yung buddy’s burger — anlamig nung tinapay… anubayan!  yung macaroni salad, ayoko (masarap akong mag macaroni salad eh!)  yung bulalo?

“kuya, bakit ganito itong bulalo nyo?” tanong ko sa waiter.

“ano po yun?”

“ba’t ganito ito — walang utak,” sabi ko, “eh, yun ang binabayaran dun!”

nagluluto ako ng bulalo.  ang utak, nirereserba ko para sa may gusto — espesyal kasi yun.  eh, itong bulalo ni buddy’s, nagmistulang nilagang baka kasi… walang utak!

just another other day

happy new year!!!


that is how i and a million others worldwide greeted the end of 2016, and the beginning of 2017.

but it is only because we have held on to the notion that january 1 is the beginning of a new year.  we believe it to be so, and thus, we live as if it were really so.  but not everyone celebrates the new year on january 1. 

we (those who celebrate the new year on january 1) do so because we have followed the gregorian calendar, ever since we could tell what day today or tomorrow is; so for us, january 1 marks the new year.

none of us (i haven’t heard of anyone locked up under the gregorian calendar system) have sought to change it — too difficult, almost impossible, and practically needless.  besides, we are reasonable men; and reasonable men seek to adapt to what happens around them; it is the unreasonable men who seek what happens around to adapt to them — so, we leave change to these unreasonable men.

in 45 B.C. unreasonable men, led by julius caesar, changed the start of the new year from march 1 to january 1 — this is also the reason why september (sept- for seven) is not the seventh month; october (oct- for eight) not the eighth month; november (nov- for nine) not the ninth; and december (as we would expect, also because of the prefix ‘dec’ which stands for 10,) not the tenth, but the twelfth month.  the 16th century gregorian system simply revised the counting of days but retained the names of months.

julius caesar is also the reason why july is named july — julius wanted a month named after him.  so he changed the 5th (now 7th) month ‘quintilis’ or ‘quint-ember’ to ‘julius’ (july.)

but the chinese (an old culture) celebrate their new year on an entirely different day and by an entirely different method of reckoning.  they base their method on the cycles of the moon or lunar cycles.  in 2017, as of this posting, the chinese are still on the old year; their new year will come on january 28 according to their lunar calendar.   this marks their spring festival.

the jews (another old culture,) on the other hand, will celebrate their 2017 new year from sundown of september 20 to sundown of september 22 — still a long way off.  they call it the rosh hashanah, or the head of the year.

i am a reasonable man, and therefore stay locked up in the 16th century gregorian reckoning of days — and this is the new year, and the time for new year’s resolutions.

it’s just another other day!